This is another big difference between PTMPandPTLE PTMPusesaniLokkeyinsteadofa serial-number, disc-based authorization. You'll also need to download and install the PACE iLok software if you haven't already done so. Then, you'll need to find the folder «Mac Hard Drive/Library/CFMSupport» and delete the following files: DAE, Digidesign DSP Manager, DigiDirectIO, DigiHardwareSetup, DigiHwGUI, and DigiSystemInterface. If you're running Tiger and getting DAE error 1092 on startup, you'll need to upgrade to all the latest versions of PT MP and M-Audio FireWire drivers. We ran into compatibility issues with Mac OS X 10.4.2 (Tiger). I wish I could say that installation of PT MP software went smoothly, but it ended up taking a few hours. Again, as a second interface, the 1814 is a perfect fit for me. The 1814 also uses an inexpensive breakout cable instead of dedicated jacks for MIDI, S/PDIF and wordclock. The 002 is a very robust, professional- looking rackmount unit while the 1814 has more of a home-recordist look and feel that matches its much more affordable price. One of the biggest differences is the availability of wordclock I/O on the 1814. The 002 also has more extensive monitoring I/O that's not on the 1814. Both units have built- in headphone monitoring with the 1814 having two headphone jacks and the 002 one. Both support eight-channel lightpipe up to 48k, but only the 1814 supports four- channel 96k S/MUX over lightpipe. Both devices have MIDI I/O with the 002 having two outputs and the 1814 only one. The 1814 also supports 96k, but the outputs can go to 192k, as can the two front-panel inputs. The 002 has a maximum sampling rate of 96 kHz. The 1814 also has two front-panel, balanced mic/instrument inputs on Neutrik combo jacks. The 1814 has eight unbalanced ins and four balanced outs. The 002 has eight analog ins and outs that are all balanced. As you get into the I/O options, there are even more differences. For permanent studio installs, the 002 is a more obvious choice while laptop users might prefer the smaller, buss-powered 1814 as my second interface, the 1814 is a perfect choice. The 002 uses an industry-standard IEC power cable, while the 1814 can be FireWire buss-powered (six pin only, or you'll need to use the insidious wall wart). The 002 is a 2U rackmount device while the 1814 is about the size of paperback book and is only rackmountable with an accessory rack tray. There are lots of small differences between the two, however-the most apparent being physical size. The 002 Rack and 1814 are FireWire interfaces with similar I/O complements. As there are already many published reviews on Pro Tools and M-Audio hardware, this review will compare and contrast the Digi 002 interface and PT LE with the 1814 and PT MP. Secondly, producer/engineer Thom Monahan recently introduced me to the concept of syncing two 002's together via MIDI, thereby doubling PT LE's track count and available outputs, and I wanted to explore this option further. Firstly, I was looking for a second PT rig (my first is a 002 Rack) to use for location recording and overdubbing with a PowerBook. We recently received a copy of Pro Tools M- Powered (PT MP) and an 1814 so we could try out the new pairing. See the M- Audio website for a complete list of compatible interfaces almost all of their interfaces will work with the new version of LE. It was recently announced that a new version of Pro Tools LE would indeed support most M-Audio interfaces, including the FireWire 1814, their flagship FireWire box. M-Audio has long enjoyed a reputation for making some of the best-sounding, cost-effective audio interfaces on the market, so a pairing with Pro Tools software would be a huge boon to low and mid-budget recordists. Ever since M-Audio was purchased by Avid, the parent company of Digidesign, the industry speculated on whether or not Pro Tools would run on M-Audio interfaces.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |